Ransomware: Should you pay?
David Reed on why the ransomware question rarely has a universal answer, and why the strongest position is having options before the attack happens.
Article
As social inflation gathers pace, employment litigation is becoming more costly and unpredictable, creating new challenges for employers and insurers alike.
In the past, excessive claims losses driven by social inflation have most often been associated with product liability, general commercial liability, commercial auto liability, and medical professional liability claims.[1] But critically, brokers and their clients should be aware that since 2021 social inflation has also significantly driven up damage awards in employment litigation.
Social inflation refers to higher, punitive jury awards that eclipse actual economic losses. Because of social inflation, at least in part, damage awards are growing faster than the rate of economic inflation[2].
There is no single cause of social inflation, but several factors appear to be driving the phenomenon, including:
Third-party litigation funding—where outside investors pay legal costs in return for a portion of a jury award—may also contribute to increasing employment litigation risk.
Regardless of the exact causes, the cost of employment litigation has risen dramatically since 2021. While the number of cases with damage awards declined between 2016 and 2022—with a slight uptick in 2023—the peak cost for damages increased substantially.
In the years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, employment litigation awards were more closely aligned with employee compensation. Damages were determined in large part by calculating real and prospective lost salary. Punitive and other exemplary damages represented only 30% of total awards in employment litigation from 2015-2019. By contrast, from 2020-2023, punitive and other exemplary damages represented 62% of total awards, far surpassing compensatory damages.
A case in point: In 2022, a jury awarded two utility employees a record $464.6 million for being forced out of work after reporting sexual harassment and racial language. This award included $24.6 million in compensatory damages and $440 million in punitive damages.[5] Several other cases have seen punitive awards surpassing $100 million, though in some instances, courts have subsequently reduced damages[6]. (For an overview of trends in employment litigation, see this Sompo infographic.)
Employers, with the help of their brokers and insurers, can mitigate employment litigation risk by taking the following steps:
A complex combination of cultural and economic forces drives social inflation—and likely makes this a long-term, intractable challenge. But this challenge can at least be tempered by a robust risk mitigation program. On this count, brokers have an opportunity to be a valuable and trusted resource for their clients.
[1] Triple-I Blog | Legal System Abuse/Social Inflation Adds Costs and Challenges for US Casualty Insurance: AM Best
[2] sigma 4/2024: Social inflation: litigation costs drive claims inflation | Swiss Re
[3] https://defensecounsel.com/the-reptile-theory-a-new-plaintiffs-strategy-to-secure-large-jury-verdicts/
[4] Tipping the Scales: Measuring the Impact of Social Inflation – Actuarial Review Magazine
[5] Viewpoint: Jury Blasts Defense with a $464.5 Million Nuclear Verdict
[6] PLBH Receives Largest Employment Verdict In American History – Learn How We Fought for Justice for Our Clients Who Where Awarded $464.5 Million – PLBH
Social inflation impacts employment litigation losses
Brokers and their clients should be aware that since 2021 social inflation has significantly driven up damage awards in employment litigation. A robust risk mitigation program—including employee training, dispute resolution outside the courtroom, and adequate policy limits—can help meet this growing challenge.